Category Archives: Docker

Containerizing of Manifold and rtndf (almost) complete

sensorviewI’ve certainly been learning a fair bit about Docker lately. Didn’t realize that it is reasonably easy to containerize GUI nodes as well as console mode nodes so now rtnDocker contains scripts to build and run almost every rtndf and Manifold node. There are only a few that haven’t been successfully moved yet. imuview, which is an OpenGL node to view data from IMUs, doesn’t work for some reason. The audio capture node (audio) and the audio part of avview (the video and audio viewer node) also don’t work as there’s something wrong with mapping the audio devices. It’s still possibly to run these outside of a container so it isn’t the end of the world but it is definitely a TODO.

Settings files for relevant containerized nodes are persisted at the same locations as the un-containerized versions making it very easy to switch between the two.

rtnDocker has an all script that builds all of the containers locally. These include:

  • manifoldcore. This is the base Manifold core built on Ubuntu 16.04.
  • manifoldcoretf. This uses the TensorFlow container as the base instead of raw Ubuntu.
  • manifoldcoretfgpu. This uses the TensorFlow GPU-enabled container as the base.
  • manifoldnexus. This is the core node that constructs the Manifold.
  • manifoldmanager. A management tool for Manifold nodes.
  • rtndfcore. The core rtn data flow container built on manifoldcore.
  • rtndfcoretf. The core rtn data flow container built on manifoldcoretf.
  • rtndfcoretfgpu. The core rtn data flow container built on manifoldcoretfgpu.
  • rtndfcoretfcv2. The core rtn data flow container built on rtndfcoretf and adding OpenCV V3.0.0.
  • rtndfcoretfgpucv2. The core rtn data flow container built on rtndfcoretfgpu and adding OpenCV V3.0.0.

The last two are good bases to use for anything combining machine learning and image processing in an rtn data flow PPE. The OpenCV build instructions were based on the very helpful example here. For example, the recognize PPE node, an encapsulation of Inception-v3, is based on rtndfcoretfgpucv2. The easiest way to build these is to use the scripts in the rtnDocker repo.

facerec – adding OpenFace’s face recognition capability to an rtndf data flow pipeline

FaceRecI had obtained some very nice results with OpenFace in a previous project and thought it would be fun to wrap it into an rtndf pipeline processing element (PPE). It’s also a good test to see whether docker containers can be used with rtndf. Turns out they work just fine. OpenFace has some complex dependencies and it is much easier just to pull a docker container than build it locally. One approach would have been to build a new container based on the original bamos/openface but instead facerec uses a bit of a hack involving host directory mapping.

To make it easy to use, there’s a bash script in the rtndf/facerec directory called facerecstart that takes care of the docker command line (which is a bit messy). Of course, in order to recognize faces, the system needs to have been trained. rtndf/facerec includes a modified version of the OpenFace web demo that saves the data from the training in the correct form for facerec. There’s a bash script, trainstart, that starts it going and then a browser and webcam can be used to perform the training.

As with the recognize PPE, facerec can either process the whole frame or just segments that contain motion by using the output from the modet PPE. In fact both recognize and facerec can be used in the same pipeline to get combined recognition:

uvccam -> modet -> facerec -> recognize -> avview

This illustrates one of the nice features of the pipeline concept: metadata and annotation can be added progressively by multiple processing stages, adding significant value to the resulting stream.

rtndf – Python scripts for creating streaming data flow processing pipelines

LaplacianThe idea of joining together separate, lightweight processing elements to form complex pipelines is nothing new. DirectX and GStreamer have been doing this kind of thing for a long time. More recently, Apache NiFi has done a similar kind of thing but with Java classes. While Apache NiFi does have a lot of nice features, I really don’t want to live in Java hell.
I have been playing with MQTT for some time now and it is a very easy to use publish/subscribe system that’s used in all kinds of places. Seemed like it could be the glue for something…

So that’s really the background for rtnDataFlow or rtndf as it is now called. It currently uses MQTT as its pub/sub infrastructure but there’s nothing too specific there – MQTT could easily be swapped out for something else if required. The repo consists of a number of pipeline processing elements that can be used to do some (hopefully) useful things. The primary language is Python although there’s nothing stopping anything being used provided it has an MQTT client and handles the JSON messages correctly. It will even be able to include pipeline processing elements in Docker containers. This will make deployment of new, complex, pipeline processing elements very simple.

The pipeline processing elements are all joined up using topics. Pipeline processing elements can publish to one or more topics and/or subscribe to one or more topics. Because pub/sub systems are intrinsically multicasting, it’s very easy to process data in multiple ways in parallel (for redundancy, performance or functionality). MQTT also allows pipeline processing elements to be distributed on multiple systems, allowing load sharing and heterogeneous computing systems (where only some machines might be fitted with GPUs for example).

Obviously, tools are required to design the pipelines and also to manage them at runtime. The design aspect will come from an old code generation project. While that actually generates C and Python code from a design that the user inputs via a graphical interface, the rtnDataFlow version will just make sure all topic names and broker addresses line up correctly and then produce a pipeline configuration file. A special app, rtnFlowControl, will run on each system and will be responsible for implementing the pipeline design specified.

So what’s the point of all of this? I’m tired of writing (or reworking) code multiple times for slightly different applications. My goal is to keep the pipeline processing elements simple enough and tightly focused so that the specific application can be achieved by just wiring together pipeline processing elements. There’ll end up being quite a few of these of course and probably most applications will still need custom elements but it’s better than nothing. My initial use of rtnDataFlow will be to assist with experiments to see how machine learning tools can be used with IoT devices to do interesting things.